Thoughts On Ars Magica 5th Edition

I was inspired by some of Justin Alexander's posts on Ars Magica to check it out. 

This isn't a full review but a collection of observations. For a more thorough review, look here.

The system does several things that I liked. The focus on building a covenant essentially places the players into domain-level play from the very beginning, foregrounding issues of local politics. Also, there is a strong influence on long-term character development through what D&D would characterize as downtime actions. 

The systems for things like training, teaching, writing books and developing spells are quite robust and as such play can be easily extended over seasons. This necessarily requires some abstraction, but the benefit is that character arcs are longer and the system supports stories with long-term payoffs.

The magic system is central to the entire game and as such it is very detailed, certainly more so than most games I've played or run. It's difficult for me to determine how well this would work in play. My impression is that it would present a high bar to entry for both players and GM, but with enough practice could provide some very deep problem-solving opportunities. The spontaneous magic system combines a verb and object to create different types of effects and is really genius. The first time I came across anything similar was at Papers and Pencils with his Magic Words. The details presented in Ars Magica do add complexity, but they also make it easier for the GM and player to arrive at consistent rulings, so I think Ars Magica's tables of spell effects vs spell level are worth the added complication.

How much complication is worth it, though? I like the basis of the system, but on top of that add rules for spell resistance, penetration, quick-casting, ritual casting, adding power through expending magical resources, spell fumbles, magical twilight... it's enough to make the head swim. 

Where does this leave us? Would I play Ars Magica? Definitely. Would I run Ars Magica? I think I would, with sufficient time and the right players. The game screams for long form play and the depth is there to support players willing to invest toward system mastery. My favorite part of the game, however isn't the systems, but the stories they enable. I can envision a game where players are living more than in a life-or-death scrum, where the problems they face are closer to the ones normal people face every day? How can I spend my time improve my lot for my family? Should I make new acquaintances or focus on old friends? Explore or exploit?What kind of a person do I want to be? 

These are the kinds of stories I want to be involved with.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RPG Review: Worlds Without Number

Image
Worlds Without Number Kevin Crawford Sine Nomine Publishing In college I became friends with a guy named Greg whose passion was cars. He raced them, fixed them, learned all he could, spent all his money on them.  He and a number of other car people owned 1990s Honda Civics - small, low-horsepower, hatchbacks - not flashy. I asked him why and he that they were old, so easily accessible, cheap, simply constructed with plentiful spare parts for modifications. The light frame gave it spectacular performance when the engine was upgraded. Greg took me for a ride once and the performance of his modded Civic was indeed spectacular. To compare Kevin Crawford's 398-page RPG rules tome to a light-bodied racer might seem nuts, but bear with me. First, and most importantly, Worlds Without Number (WWN) is a complete game. Everything you need to play and to generate game content is inside, and it is well thought-out so that newer GMs and veterans alike should be able to benefit. As a comparison, ...
Read more

On the Difficulty Problem of Magic

Lately I have been thinking a lot about how to implement a magic system in my tabletop roleplaying games. I would like to create something rather long-lasting in a persistent world where players might be able to play over generations and see the effects of their actions.  As such, I want a system with rules that I can reference to consistently adjudicate actions. I also want to treat magic as a kind technology that can be developed over time to create emergent effects on the world. This post from the Crossing the 'Verse blog represents an attempt to codify mechanically how different types of magic might manifest. It is part of a larger, useful series attempting to reach the heart of what magic is, in-game. When considering the magic system one problem that emerges is how to explain why some people use magic and others don't. If magic can be broadly considered a kind of technology, then why is there a class of magic users and why don't peasants employ goodberries to feed th...
Read more

Epistemic Rec Team

Why write a blog with no readers? Originally the answer to this question was memory failure, boredom and a dash of spite. I conceived of the blog as a way to archive my intellectual progress, to help consolidate and remember what I was thinking and when. It was the summer of 2020 and COVID, so I had the time and I wanted to prove an asshole wrong - an asshole who correctly pointed out that I hadn't added anything substantive to online conversation surrounding RPGs.  I'm still doubtful about contributing meaningfully to any sort of gaming or rationalist discourse (I would need readers and content first). Also, there are moments when I can feel the resounding irrelevance of ruminating over ideas too esoteric and already chewed. Funny thing is most of the time I enjoy writing here. Recently I read Scott Alexander's post entitled  Epistemic Minor Leagues and realized I'm just doing the same thing as everyone else and probably have the same worries. That post was a response...
Read more